Jurisprudence of the Revolution

Generalities, imperatives, obligatory statements, spontaneity, and randomness are all signs of weakness in the course and activities of the revolution.

When revolutionary discourse is directed at an unspecified target, no one will consider them the intended target if the content carries any blame.

Phrases like “The efforts of the revolution, the opposition, and others must be such and such…” will not lead to a specific outcome for the revolution.

Phrases like “The efforts, actions, and positions must be such and such…” will not lead to any practical step for the revolution because the subject of these statements assumes that someone else is the intended target.

When each individual, group, or bloc spontaneously expresses their own vision, views, and statements on the basis that each individual or group is the heart of the revolution or the opposition, this is a dispersion of efforts, a waste of time, and a dilution of objectives.

When all parties affiliated with the revolution or the opposition operate independently and independently of each other, international public opinion will feel that there are dozens or hundreds of representatives and spokesmen for this revolution, and will not care about its seriousness. As a result, everyone will work to waste the sacrifices of hundreds of thousands of Syrians who have given their all for our blessed revolution.
To be continued…

Dr. Saadeddin Al-Barza

Share it on:

Also read

Syria is at the forefront of the fight against terrorism, and Europe is undergoing a conditional shift between security pragmatism and the demands of human rights.

The European shift towards Syria in light of a new equation with a focus on combating terrorism and human rights.

13 Feb 2026

الدكتور زاهر بعدراني

The prestige of the state and the simplicity of the rulers

A comparison between models of governance in Islam: representative prestige and ascetic simplicity, and their role in the Syrian context.

13 Feb 2026

جمعة محمد لهيب